February 12, 2010

Cricket blurring Line of Control for politicians?

India is a democratic country and everyone here has the right to say whatever he or she may feel on any topic or incident. This is what we were told in school and probably that’s what Shah Rukh Khan must have had in mind when he expressed his views on the non-inclusion of Pakistani cricketers in the third season of Indian Premiere League (IPL) . What he said found some support and more criticism in political circles.

What I inferred from the incident is that SRK's ‘free and fair’ opinion on the IPL episode gave a new mudda (issue) to the s(ti)inking Maharashtra politics. Even as some of the leaders of Hindu rightist Shiv Sena said it was not Shah Rukh Khan but the ruling Congress that was making the statements using its association with SRK, the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) used it as an opportunity to attack Amitabh Bachchan for his association with Pakistani artists.

Shiv Saniks held protests infront of Mannat (The Baadshah’s abode in Mumbai) and vandalized posters of his film ‘My Name is Khan.’ Despite assurances by the Maharashtra police and ruling government to the film’s producer Karan Johar, some of the multiplexes had to shut down as the demonstrations started.

A mere statement by one of the most loved actors of this country made him a ‘traitor’ in the eyes of some political goons? And the handicap state government could not provide enough security? What public good does this serve? Can the film, which does not belong to an individual alone, be dragged into a dirty game of such low politics?

It makes me wonder what actually had Shah Rukh said and why didn’t it find any favour with the Shiv Sena and the likes of Bajrang Dal, Vishva Hindu Parishad. ''They are the champions, they are wonderful but somewhere down the line there is an issue and we can't deny it," Khan had told a TV new channel. "We are known to invite everyone. We should have. If there were any issues, they should have been put on board earlier. Everything can happen respectfully. Everyday we blame Pakistan, everyday Pakistan blames us. It is an issue.”

So how many of you feel that he made a mistake? Should he have known that besides being an artist who earns his bread in Shiv Sena's home turf, he's as vulnerable as any other man who speaks his heart, which may not always be liked by the roaring (mourning) tigers of Mumbai.

But as some media reports suggested, My Name Is Khan opened to full houses across the country. This only shows that any educated and sensible being on this earth would not blindly follow whatever hard winged parties like these want them to. These parties are just out for some cheap publicity at the cost of some film actors. The bigger the star, the bigger is the chance to make some news headlines.

What happened to Jodha Akbar, Lajja, Fanna, and the list goes on.... Why is the Election Commission not taking any action against such political parties? Why are these brain dead maggots left open to spill hatred on the streets of this country? They have no development issues left but are busy generating animosity among communities with all their unethical and unconstitutional ways. Political parties and their leaders who paralyse normal life and harass citizens shouldn't be allowed to contest elections.

These are the same parties who burn churches, vandalise public property, kill innocent men and then roam around free, because they regard themselves above the law. They are the real lawbreakers.

It's high time now to stop making statements and do something about it. SRK tweeting a 'regret' after these paper tigers have had their say is not a solution. At least cinema, art and literature should be spared of this horror, generated by a handful of political goondas carrying Trishuls and weapons as if they alone can save this country from evils. Such weak attitude in tackling these mafias in the garb of political parties is only aggravating the problem.

4 comments:

Shubhajit said...

Your article reminded me of a story, which may (I believe it does) some truth in it. When Hitler's indomitable brutal Nazis were about to take over France the French President appealed to the GREAT DICTATOR, THE BRUTE, THE FUHRER, that he did not destroy the Louvre. Hitler promised and France surrendered. Surprising the whole world Hitler kept his promise. Even that brute had some sense to keep literature and art apart from war.

On another note it is now a proven fact that India, regardless of state, city, and territory, has lost its earlier tolerant, secular, and multicultural face.

Politicians know that once they are elected it is impossible for the aam admi to throw them out, unless their coalition back off, even that can be tackled if they bargain well, Congress was saved by SP when the Lefts backed out. We should be more vocal about putting pressure on the government. A few articles and discussion sessions will make no difference. Politicians know the game, they have played it more than once. To them "yeh sab tou chalta hai", part of the political game. Now BJP is distancing itself from the Shiv Sena, but for how long? The EVM does not have a "none of the above" option yet. You still have to choose among the five thugs. So you will choose the lesser one. I am frustrated and looking for answers. May be we all should. Demanding for the "None of the Above" can be a start. MNS won the election last time. Hitler won a election too. At least down somewhere the Great Destructor had a more sensible face.

abhi said...

I wont write it here but will tell u over chat...abhishek deheriya

Shobhit Sujay said...

Yes u r right in saying that there was nothng wrong in whatever SRK said...n undoubtedly, these political goons end up doing nothing but disturbing the harmony in the country...However - i know it would be little mean to say this - but SRK's intention of promoting the film in the garb of his statement cannot be ruled out. We know that the film talks about a particular community, and hence it has a somewhat good number of audience in Pakistan. Well, of course he didn't expect such reaction on it. And I am compelled to say this about SRK as he being owner of one the teams, didn't choose a single player, though he did admit in an interview (probably the one u refferred to - Barkha Dutt) that few players did fit in his team's scheme of things. However, the movie is excellent, and displays dedication and honesty by the caste and crew, so it was bound to do well. However, leme just clarify that I don't back the political hooliganism at all...

Just A Writer said...

Well, thanks all of you who posted their valuable comments. I would just like to add that SRK might have taken this as a chance to promote his film but why on Earth would be sympathise with his Pakistani fans alone... This is actually debatable as to what Shah Rukh did was deliberate? After all, the film is earning big bucks all over the world. But still then, any movie has to be good enough to be a success. Mere controversy cant win the odds. As I write this I am thinking of Om Shanti Om... With SRK...anthing is possible