There Is A Little Me In Every You

This is my entry for the HarperCollins–IndiBlogger Get Published contest, which is run with inputs from Yashodhara Lal and HarperCollins. Please vote : http://www.indiblogger.in/getpublished/idea/515/

Pic Courtesy: weheartit.com

Prerna Anand, a lower middle class girl from Meerut city, wanted to be a Television Anchor ever since she passed her intermediate. Her mother insisted, the world was murky out there. But she just won’t listen. Her father felt, teaching was the best a woman should do after marriage.

Prerna’s dreams got bigger when she met Pratik at her Mass Communication college. She was immensely in love and was clear in her mind to have a life with him. Pratik’s confidence in her and his promises gave wings to her desires. “I have so many contacts. You can get a job any day in Media,” he said. Life would have been perfect had he not disappeared leaving her forsaken on the last day of college. She felt humiliated. Her trust had shaken and so was she from the inside. No one at home wanted her to leave for Delhi, where her destiny awaited. Finally, her best friend Kashish convinced everyone and took her to her mansion in Sundar Nagar. Rounds of interviews and auditions began. Prerna was undoubtedly beautiful and a hard-working fresher. She didn’t get a job for six months. Her father was adamant to call her back to Meerut. “Maine toh pehle hi kaha thha, mere paas faltoo paise nahin tumhare dilli ghoomne ke liye. Chup chaap wapas aa jao,” and he hung up the phone.

Prerna felt isolated. She committed suicide but survived. This infuriated Kashish’s businessman father to issue an order not to allow any friends to stay at their place. She had to move out. She managed to get a PG with Kashish’s support. She cut off from her family. No one came to see her hearing about her suicide. Her mother had only wished she could, as she whispered over the phone.

She was down but not out. She kept looking for jobs. Heartbreak had made her pursue her dreams more passionately. She grew more and more egoistic looking at the world around. When everyone else was busy thinking about themselves, why should she compromise with her dreams?

Some more interviews and then came a job that changed her life forever.

She met Sanjay Jumani, Channel Head, Indian News. He was a through professional. She spent two years at this job. Growing from an intern to a reporter and then finally becoming the face of the channel. Sanjay was fond of her and her hard work. He often gave her gifts in appreciation for her achievements. Prerna had now moved in to a society flat in Greater Kailash. Sanjay had alone decided to get married to Prerna. He thought she was okay with the idea. He came often to pick her up for office. And drop her without fail. Sometimes, he stayed back. Prerna too liked him but had not decided on marriage.

When she declined his proposal, Sanjay couldn’t take it. He pulled her by her hair and shouted, “Why were you feeding on my gifts for two years? If you were not ready to marry me?”

Again, the same ‘me’ had come on her way. Why was every one so bothered about the ‘me’ that they had completely forgotten about the other ‘you’. She disappeared from Sanjay’s life just as Pratik had, without giving him any explanation.

For five years, she remained ardently anti men. But now, the lines between hatred for men and her love for women were blurring. All this had happened because she was finally in love.

When every man in her life, beginning from her Dad, had refused to understand her, she had begun to think about marriage. She had finally met a man who was sensitive and mature. When she expressed her desire to settle down with him, he refused.

Was it because of her family background or her credentials? Had Siddhartha come to know about her past? What deterred him to tie the nuptial knot with her?

When all humans relinquished her, only her pet, Tubelight, stood till the end. May be because only dogs don’t see the “little me in every you.” If you wish to read the full story, please vote http://www.indiblogger.in/getpublished/idea/515/

What Makes This Story ‘Real’ – 

The glamour world is unkind, more so if you are a woman. Millions of small town girls with dreamy eyes come to join the Television industry but are forced to go by the rules. Those who refuse to compromise are either left half-hearted or go through a lot of muck.

Extract - She met all sorts of people at various Production Houses in Delhi. Most of them wanted to offer her a job but with some preconditions. One of them promised her one time payment of Rupees 5,000 for presenting a celeb night at Shimla, provided she had to stay a day extra after the event. Prerna had just faced the harsh realities of the glam world.

End-note: "This is my entry for the HarperCollins–IndiBlogger Get Published contest, which is run with inputs from Yashodhara Lal and HarperCollins India."

Why Is Anna Such A Hit?

The newspapers are filled with life and time of a 74-year old man, who loves to talk and doesn’t quite like it if a politician calls him “old”.Well, there has been a deluge of editorials and views off-late on the “second struggle for freedom” as the man in focus, Anna Hazare, calls it. And believing in the same ideal of “democracy” that this man has stood for, I have dared to write this article.

Brilliantly using the Indian Media and cashing in on the current anti-Congress (political) sentiments a social activist launched a fast unto death on April 5, 2011. (Did I say just 2 days after Team India won the ICC World Cup and TV news channels were looking for their next big kill? Oh, come on, that was something I read in another Editorial.)

Irrespective of whether he made any ideological sense or not, the Media jumped into the Anna bandwagon. The whole Anna phenomenon, also being tagged as “August Kranti” by some of my fellow media persons, created a sense of erroneous belief that he was the biggest crusader against corruption.

Suddenly, the entire focus shifted from other important issues like rising prices and escalating crime against woman in the capital to humungous scams India witnessed in the first 2 years of UPA II.

People were so moved by the appeals made by Anna that they even forgot about the lakhs of rupees struck in the “land acquisition controversy” in Greater Noida.

The April 5-9 campaign was a success. Government agreed to form a 10-member joint committee to draft the Jan Lokpal Bill. Almost everyone from the urban middle-class learned the term “civil society.” Not even bothering to know if there was any difference at all between society and civil society. Five (only male) representatives including an eminent father-son duo of lawyers, a Justice (Retd), a former IRS officer and a social activist formed a group named as “Team Anna”.

They held a series of meetings with “Team Manmohan” which included our Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, a veteran Congress leader and a taint-free Cabinet ranked minister.

After several deliberations on an anti-graft bill or the Jan Lokpal Bill, the two sides exchanged their drafts of the same. The discussions were not kept to themselves rather Media was called after almost every meeting to accuse and abuse the ruling political class.

The movement started to change colour from an anti-corruption campaign to an anti-Congress one. As if all the previous non-Congress governments had been corruption free.

There were accusations and counter-accusations among politicians and the new-found representatives of the civil society. Some of the Congress men went to the extent of calling Anna an agent of Hindu nationalist organisation RSS (as a backlash of Centre’s show down on emerging “saffron terror” in the country). There were reports of free meals at Anna’s 12-day battleground, Ramlila Maidan, being funded by one of the affiliates of the right-winged Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. The Sangh and its associates, however, denied any direct links to the campaign.

It was after the government referred their version of the bill, bypassing Team Anna’s draft of the Jan Lokpal Bill, in the Parliament that the campaign turned more aggressive and in many ways one-dimensional.

Why Anna Is Not Gandhi

The whole Anna movement spoke of either standing with them or being pro-corrupt. This in itself is “undemocratic”. There is always a space for debates and disagreements in a democratic set up. But this seemed to disappear in the second campaign. Anna declared: “You pass my bill, or I shall go on fast-unto-death”.

The theatrics and the symbolism used by Team Anna during the entire campaign made the comparisons with Mahatma Gandhi an anomaly. Gandhi led India’s biggest freedom movement by spreading awareness among the common man.

Here, the situation was completely different. Public emotions played a great role. Most of the people joining the campaign either didn’t know what the Jan Lokpal Bill was or didn’t bother to quantify the implications of implementing all the conditions proposed by Team Anna.

Only a select few could see the castle of “unrealistic” expectations this movement built. A single piece of paper (The Jan Lokpal Bill) promising billions of people including the corrupt ones to rid the country of up to 70% corruption. Amazing, isn’t it?

Ignorance can mobilise crowds, even as the Media can make anything look “larger than life”. Thousands of people pledged support to Annaji without getting into the feasibility aspect of the Jan Lokpal Bill.

The campaign now changed from anti-Congress to anti-Parliament with Anna telling the crowd about how the Jan Sansad was above the real Sansad i.e. The Parliament. People were moved, some celebs and some wannabe activists shared dais with the star campaigner.

People used the stage to vent anger against the ruling Congress. Forgetting that corruption was as much rooted in state politics, as it was in the politics of the Centre.

Policies are made at the Centre but (not) implemented at state levels. Anna never spoke about the corruption in BJP-ruled Karnataka during his entire campaign. (Some of us had not been able to forget his praise for BJP poster boy and Gujarat CM Narendra Modi).

Neither did he spoke on how the present provisions under the law could be strengthened to curb corruption.

How his bill would stop the local policewala to take bribe from hawkers and street vendors. How it would stop shopkeepers at Railway stations and other public places from overcharging consumers. How it would contain the root cause of corruption i.e. malice and sheer poverty? 

Several questions were left unanswered. The entire attention diverted to long speeches, melodrama and extensive live coverage. Some musical bands performing at the venue took care of the rest. Popular youth poet Dr Kumar Vishwas was the stage manager, sometimes citing his famous lines (Koi deewana kehta hai).

Anna’s fast-cum-campaign, criticised of being highly rightist, ended with two Dalit and Muslim girls (hand-picked from the crowd) serving him coconut water with honey. This was the perfect ending to a well choreographed show backed by large-scale SMS, social media campaigns to make sure they did not miss out on the “Youth”.

The August 16th fast-unto-death movement gathered maximum eyeballs on news channels even as the TRPs of TV soaps slumped.

Anna seemed to be the face of the campaign with others like Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi being the real voices behind. The exit of Swami Agnivesh and Justice (Rtrd) Hegde gave force to this belief.

Secondly, Anna’s announcement of a campaign for electoral reforms has left me pondering as to where would this hijacking technique end?  This self-proclaimed Gandhian chose to suggest people to reject an elected representative Govt than to encourage the urban non-voting middle class to vote for the right candidates.

Looking at the huge public support behind him, he should have encouraged people to come forward and join Politics. After all, this government or any government in the next General Elections needs people who want to work for the country, on or off the camera.

Also Read: Does Lack Of Political Will Or Ignorance Kill A Social Moment?